[jump] Phillips 66 plans to build new tanks to store propane and butane gas, byproducts of the refining process. Currently, the refinery uses these materials to power its operations. When the project is completed, Phillips 66 will sell the propane and butane, buying cheaper natural gas to power the plant.
Phillips 66 public affairs manager Paul Adler told the supervisors that “the new equipment will cut sulfur emissions by half,” and thus “lead to cleaner air.” Shipping the propane and butane out by rail will not change the number of trains leaving the refinery, although it will add cars, he said. The project “won’t change the volume or type of crude oil processed by the refinery,” Adler added. “This is not a crude-by-rail project.”
“This is a tar-sands-by-rail project,” countered Roger Lin, attorney for Communities for a Better Environment. CBE previously submitted a technical analysis concluding that the goals of the project could not be achieved without a switch to dirtier, heavier crude oil. CBE also quoted Phillips 66 CEO Greg Garland announcing the company’s intention to increase profits by refining cheaper crude oil, specifically mentioning “Canadian crude.” (Tar sands crude is the cheapest around.)
CBE predicts that the project in Rodeo, together with a linked project in the Phillips 66 refinery in Santa Maria (San Luis Obispo County), will mean that tar sands crude oil will travel by train from Canada to San Luis Obispo, on tracks that run through East Bay cities. It will be partially refined in San Luis Obispo County, then sent via pipeline to the Rodeo plant to complete the refining process.
Lin said Tuesday that the final environmental impact review of the project presents no new data to counter CBE’s analysis, simply restating Phillips’ declaration that the project will not change the type of crude oil the plant refines.
When the project first came up for approval, supervisors asked for a revised environmental impact review to address concerns raised by community groups and by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. The air district was especially concerned about the “cumulative health impacts” of adding this project to others in the area. In this week’s hearing, Tim Rimpo of Environmental Science Associates, a member of the county’s environmental review team, said the county had worked closely with the air district. Although they found the project would increase emissions of some toxic air pollutants, they agreed that “all the impacts would be less than the air district’s significance thresholds.”