.Senator Mark Leno Proposes Limits on Solitary Confinement in Juvenile Facilities

At juvenile correctional facilities throughout California, incarcerated youth routinely end up in solitary confinement. Although the state doesn’t collect any uniform data on the use of solitary for youth, public records have suggested that it could very well be common. For example, in 2011, court documents revealed that there were 249 incidents of solitary confinement during a fourteen-week period at five juvenile facilities in the state. Now, a coalition of criminal justice advocates is hoping to reform the policies for juvenile correctional facilities through legislation introduced today that would limit the use of solitary confinement.

Senate Bill 124, from Senator Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and co-sponsored by the Oakland-based Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, would establish specific, limited circumstances in which state and county juvenile correctional facilities would be permitted to place someone in solitary confinement. Facilities can only use solitary confinement if an individual “poses an immediate and substantial risk of harm to the security of the facility” or “poses an immediate and substantial risk of harm to others that is not the result of a mental disorder,” the draft of the bill states. 

[jump] An individual who is a danger to himself or herself or others as a result of a mental disorder cannot be placed in solitary confinement, according to the bill, which states that facilities must instead transfer these individuals to mental health facilities for evaluation.

The legislation further requires that a person only be held in solitary confinement for the “minimum time required to address the risk, and for a period of time that does not compromise the mental and physical health of the minor.” The proposal additionally sets a four-hour time limit. And if a minor in solitary confinement appears to be suffering from a mental disorder, the individual should be transported to a mental health facility (if a professional determines that is appropriate). The bill also bans the use of consecutive periods of solitary confinement and prohibits the use of this practice for purposes of “discipline, punishment, coercion, convenience, or retaliation by staff.”

For the first time, juvenile facilities would have to document their use of solitary confinement under SB 124, which would establish specific reporting requirements, including a description of circumstances that led to the use of solitary confinement and details on alternative actions and sanctions that officials attempted and found unsuccessful. 

The law wouldn’t apply to minors in adult correctional facilities. 

Leno said in a statement: 
Deliberately depriving incarcerated young people of human contact, education, exercise and fresh air is inhumane and can have devastating psychological effects for these youth, who are already vulnerable to depression and suicide. This type of severe segregation, even if temporary, must be reserved for the most extreme cases in which the young people are in danger of jeopardizing their own safety or that of facility personnel. Troubled youth need treatment, not isolation, if we want them to avoid a future life of crime and become productive members of society.
The 2011 study of court records that Leno referenced in a press release today on SB 124 also found that youth at one facility in California were only allowed out of solitary confinement for an average of forty minutes per day. 

Research has also shown that the use of solitary confinement is correlated with high rates of suicide. A 2009 national survey found that half of the youth in the juvenile justice system who committed suicide were isolated and alone when they died, according to Leno’s office. And more than 10 percent of incarcerated juveniles who committed suicide had been in solitary prior to their deaths. Six states already ban solitary confinement for punitive reasons and New York recently banned the use of solitary for youth 21 and younger, Leno’s office noted. 

In 2013, the Express wrote about an East Bay lawsuit against juvenile authorities, which alleged that youth in Contra Costa County were spending months in solitary confinement and suffering mental breakdowns as a result. 

SB 124 — which is also co-sponsored by the Youth Justice Coalition, the Children’s Defense Fund-California, and the California Public Defenders Association — will be heard in state Senate policy committees this spring. You can read the full proposed text of the bill here


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

East Bay Express E-edition East Bay Express E-edition