Letters for December 9

Readers sound off on Marcel Diallo, PG&E, and the milk industry.

“You Don’t Know Jack,” Full Disclosure, 11/18

Where’s the Evidence?

Firstly, I am a thirty-year resident of Oakland, the current project
manager for the Black Dot Café, and I am the president of the
Village Bottoms Neighborhood Association.

Robert Gammon’s article is so obviously a hatchet job on a
grassroots community cultural movement that I hesitate to dignify it
with a response. But there are many people new to the community and
they may be susceptible to believing this type of disinformation
masquerading as journalism.

To begin with, what is the “strong evidence” that Gammon is talking
about in this article? For years I’ve noticed that people sit outside
cafes and other businesses to get Internet access, send, and receive
e-mail. Anyone could have done the same on the Black Dot Café’s
wi-fi or Marcel’s house wi-fi. Gammon has obviously spent little or no
time on Pine Street or he could have observed that it is not “sparsely
populated” but populated by a community of artists and dedicated
volunteers who all know Marcel. In addition to that, all of us have
been in the cafe at all hours of the night. I don’t know who sent the
e-mail, but nothing in this article convinces me that it wasn’t Max
Allstadt.

Robert Gammon not only doesn’t have any knowledge of the Village
Bottoms as a community but he refuses to be ethical enough to engage us
to gather accurate information. Our neighborhood association meetings
are open to the public and held at the Black Dot Café. He could
easily have attended one of the meetings. We know that he doesn’t want
to do that because he would have to acknowledge that we are educated,
dedicated, hardworking volunteers in the Village Bottoms that are
working with little resources other than the strength of our
convictions. As much as people like Gammon, Allstadt and the rest of
their gentrification crew want to complain about how bad crime is in
West Oakland, they attack people who are working very hard to beautify
and uplift our community. Let’s be honest that’s what this piece is
about. It is an attack on the right of Black folks to build and
beautify our own cultural district in the same manner that North Beach
does for Italians, Chinatown does for the Chinese, and the Fruitvale
District does for Latinos.

People like Gammon have the unmitigated gall to criticize activists
who are making positive change in our local communities by insinuating
that it is just being “stubborn” to try to keep our homes and continue
our work in the midst of one of the worst economic downturns in
American history. Gammon takes a very insensitive position in these
economic times, doesn’t he? How about highlighting determination in the
midst of economic adversity? Economic adversity that is increased by
people like Max Allstadt, Sean Sullivan, and Richard Fuentes. These
people who refused to engage the already-established longtime community
workers and took over the board membership of organizations that
control much-needed grant money such as the CDBG. I witnessed this
disgusting display the night that Sean Sullivan, Richard Fuentes, and
other folks, who comparatively speaking just showed up the day before
yesterday, disrespect elders who have been working in this community
for decades. Sean Sullivan, Richard Fuentes, Max Allstadt, and their
constituency that I suspect includes the author of this article are
attempting to monopolize grant money that could be used to bring
projects such as the Village Bottoms Farm to full fruition. Instead of
assisting us, writers like Gammon ridicule us.

To inaccurately call The Black New World a “… rusted, corrugated
metal shack …” and leave out the fact that its stage has hosted
nationally and internationally recognized poets, musicians, and
politicians is a blatant lie of omission.

If the East Bay Express is truly about unbiased community
reporting then send a journalist to the Black Dot Café to
experience the community firsthand. We’re not hiding. We are welcoming
everyone to experience the beauty of our community.

Duane Deterville, Oakland

Disparaging Good Work

I feel compelled to respond to Robert Gammon’s article “You Don’t
Know Jack.” I have several beefs, but I’ll focus on the following:

I have met Marcel Diallo while working with a planning nonprofit
that has consulted with him regarding a vision for the future of the
Lower Bottoms in West Oakland. His vision is one of economic and
cultural revitalization of a community that has been there for
generations. The efforts to realize this vision have been
genuinely grassroots. Money is scarce, accommodations are
marginal, and work often stalls while funds are being
raised. Gammon’s article disparages this work with innuendo,
implying that somehow because of these financial struggles and marginal
structures the work is illegitimate or unworthy. Such innuendo is a
cheap and convenient way to portray Max Allstadt, in comparison, as a
rising star.

Mr. Diallo’s vision places race front and center, which can make
white folks uncomfortable. It’s also rooted deeply in place, in
efforts to reclaim a history that has been erased, and in efforts to
create genuine grassroots economic opportunity. While I don’t
always feel comfortable with the rhetoric, I wholeheartedly support the
efforts of the Village Bottoms neighborhood and the Black New World
precisely because it is a heartfelt, genuinely grassroots effort to
honor history, place, and people. No effort is made in the article
to portray these aspects of the work of Mr. Diallo and the Village
Bottoms community.

Mr. Allstadt and his “clique” (Gammon’s own words, I suggest you
look up the definition, the part about “excluding others”) are clearly
playing political hardball. Having consolidated power on the West
Oakland CDBG board they appear to have been only too happy to deny
funding to the Village Bottoms farm project. While an alleged lack
of activity at the 10th and Pine Village Bottoms Farm is cited in the
article to further disparage Diallo, no connection is made to this
simple fact: There’s no better way to keep the corner of 10th and Pine
a boarded-up vacant lot than to deny funding to grassroots efforts to
transform it.

The article’s bias is further made clear when it states that
Allstadt and his friends are “challenging the neighborhood’s
traditional black and progressive power structure” without exploring
what this really means.  Did it occur to Mr. Gammon that Marcel
Diallo and the Village Bottoms community offer a genuine alternative to
precisely this type of blind political ambition? As I noted above,
their work looks both forward to a sustainable future, and back many
generations, explicitly and consciously honoring elders both living and
dead.  It will be a damn shame if the collective memory of these
elders is thrown under the bus in the rush of Mr. Allstadt and his
“young white activist” friends to consolidate power.

Geoff Holton, Berkeley

A Character Assassination

It’s a shame that Oakland political blogger Max Allstadt was victim
of Internet fraud. He has every right to be upset. But likewise readers
of the Express have a right to be upset that lacking any
conclusive evidence, the Express nevertheless felt comfortable
acting as judge and jury in issuing a verdict, all on Mr. Allstadt’s
hunches. In fact, any one of dozens of people who had the password to
the Internet hotspot for the Black Dot Cafe wireless could have done
the deed and were likely upset enough to consider it.

But Allstadt apparently decided early on that it must have been
Diallo after he (Allstadt) and his caucus on the West Oakland community
block grant board (CBDG) voted against the Village Bottoms Farms
project proposal submitted by Diallo’s NGO. My nonprofit organization,
Ecocity Builders, was a partner on the Village Bottoms Farms CBDG RFP.
Ecocity Builders and the Village Bottoms Neighborhood Association
crafted the proposal after spending time in Milwaukee studying urban
farming and aquaponics with MacArthur Foundation “Genius Grant” awardee
Will Allen and his organization, Growing Power. Allen is the nation’s
leading expert on low-cost aquaponics, a method of growing fish and
greens affordably on brownfield sites in a closed loop, stacked
system.

Our proposal was, and still is, to launch a prototype urban farm and
aquaponics system on a vacant lot and former scrapyard on Pine Street
in the Lower Bottoms, working under the coaching and technical
assistance of Growing Power and Mo Betta Foods, a Black-run food
security organization in West Oakland. The funding from the CBDG award
would have allowed the community to build out the farm, hire a few
locals to run it, and set up a marketing program to get the produce
into the hands of neighborhood families. After the Farm was up and
running it would mostly sustain itself though revenues from the sale of
produce. It would also become a West Coast training center for Growing
Power’s aquaponics systems and methodology. We were in the process of
securing a Regional Operations Training Center (ROTC) agreement with
Growing Power pending the successful outcome of the RFP to the
CBDG.

But Allstadt and his caucus had already decided who would get
funded, and it was not going to be Village Bottoms Farms. Apparently to
make sure of that, before the vote was taken on Village Bottoms Farms’
proposal, Allstadt’s associate on the board announced to everyone that
if they did recommended the VB Farms proposal, HUD (the federal funder)
would mostly likely revoke all funding from Oakland’s CBDG programs
because the Farm was proposing to set up an enterprise that would
create jobs to sell produce for a profit.

This misleading statement was completely false. HUD WANTS to support
local job creation and boost local economies through business
development. However, the alarmist announcement created visible
confusion and a hesitancy among the board. The proposal was voted down
a few minutes later and a white-run NGO doing community and backyard
gardening was approved.

Ecocity Builders immediately wrote a letter to the Oakland City
Attorney about the seeming overt attempt to sabotage the neighborhood’s
proposal. The Attorney’s office replied that they would look into the
matter and eventually sent a letter stating that although they
acknowledged that the false eligibility question had been raised
against the proposal, and that although it was indeed not factual, most
people on the board probably would have known that.

So in other words, they dropped it.

So getting back to the e-mail attack on Mr. Allstadt …. By this
point, a lot of people were upset, not just Marcel Diallo. Five of us
had gone to Milwaukee to study with Growing Power, more people had
helped craft the proposal, even more had been to community events to
learn about the project and were getting excited. Village Bottoms Farms
was hosting weekly work parties to prepare the site and many people
were coming through on a regular basis to volunteer.

A short time after the board’s funding decision, someone did send a
hateful e-mail from the vicinity of the Black Dot Cafe, and it was
wrong. But to conclude that it had to have been sent by Marcel Diallo
is irresponsible. Obviously, it could have been any number of people
who were deeply upset, disappointed, and frustrated. That it happened
at a strange hour is not that surprising … people in West Oakland
keep odd hours, many don’t have regular “9-to-5” jobs although they
probably wish they did. After getting to know Marcel for several years
now, I don’t believe he sent the e-mail; he wouldn’t stoop to that
level and he’s too smart to set himself up like that. But that’s my
opinion. He hasn’t actually been found guilty. Unless you count this
character-assassinating East Bay Express article.

There is so much more that I could add to this letter because there
are so many more inaccuracies and misleading and damaging conclusions
from Mr. Gammon’s article. But for now I will just finish the story
about the farm, only one of the several grassroots community
enterprises currently being incubated on Pine Street.

After receiving zero funds for the farm from the CBDG board, we kept
on working on the project anyway, eventually securing small grants from
Kaiser Permanente and the Foundation for Sustainability and Innovation.
To date, the farm compost system is up and running with the red wiggler
worms getting nice and fat. The community has built the first
aquaponics systems, they however need to get the greenhouse finished
before they can add fish to the tank. Local businesses are supplying
the resource streams for the compost: coffee grounds, brewery waste,
sawdust and wood chips, food scraps. Community volunteers are there
every day working on the project. Ecocity Builders and the Village
Bottoms Neighborhood are jointly gearing up to apply to more funding
sources to build out the prototype farm. The vision is to eventually
expand farther down the street where one day a much larger urban
farming enterprise could start providing more fresh and healthy food to
the community while creating jobs and food security in the
neighborhood.

The plan is part of a larger vision for the sustainable development
of the entire Lower Bottoms. If you are interested we have a sixty-page
booklet outlining the vision, along with a comprehensive section on the
history of the area and another section on the residents’ vision for
its sustainable future. Their vision is about honoring, supporting, and
uplifting local culture, the environment, and the economy, 

I hope the slanted and inflammatory article in the Express
has perked your interest in finding out what’s actually going on in the
Lower Bottoms in West Oakland. Please stop by the Black Dot Cafe, have
a cup of tea, and learn more about the positive vision for the
community.

Kirstin Miller, Executive Director, Ecocity Builders,
Oakland

Cut Diallo Some Slack

In the November 18 article “You Don’t Know Jack,” Robert Gammon
seems to have traded in his role as a journalist for that of
prosecutor, judge, and jury all in one. It’s one thing to report that
Marcel Diallo is accused of sending a fraudulent e-mail (with no proof
that he actually did). But spending two-thirds of the article on a
one-sided attempt to paint Marcel as a desperate scam artist without
any kind of alternate viewpoint does not reflect well on Mr. Gammon’s
journalistic integrity. He really sounds more like Max Allstadt’s PR
manager than a reporter for a weekly newspaper.Marcel’s biggest
offense, as spun off in the title of the story, seems to be that his
real name is Marcel Diallo Jack, not Marcel Diallo. Ha, gotcha! Anyone
not going by their birth name obviously can’t be trusted with
truth-telling, especially if he’s a poet. You know, like Bob Dylan,
that lying, cheating sun of a gun. Seriously, you’re going to discredit
someone because he has an artist name?The next thing Marcel apparently
has going against him in Robert Gammon’s trust department is that he’s
poor and got hit hard by the current housing crisis. Gee, if only he
had a trust fund while growing up in one of the poorest neighborhoods
in the country, we’d cut him some slack. But no, who on earth does he
think he is, trying to get loans to buy and remodel property and revive
the neighborhood he and generations of his family grew up in?I applaud
Mr. Gammon’s thoroughness in raking through every detail of Marcel
Diallo’s finances, but I wish he had spent even a fraction of that time
coming down to the Village Bottoms and talking with the community
members. He would have found that “the gated vacant lot that appears to
resemble a farm” is an aquaponic system, a method of growing crops and
fish together on re-circulating raised beds, based on MacArthur
Fellowship recipient Will Allen’s inner-city farming model.He also
would have found that Marcel and the community have been diligently
working with Ecocity Builders on a plan to rebuild the Village Bottoms,
not only to create new opportunities for a community beaten down by a
history of discriminatory urban planning decisions, but to heal the
wounds of the past by honoring its cultural roots and integrating
21st-century environmental principles. I know this because I was a
volunteer in doing the historical research for the sixty-page booklet.I
don’t know who wrote the e-mails in question, and neither does Robert
Gammon. But I do know that this kind of attempt at character
assassination doesn’t help anyone with a sincere interest in rebuilding
a struggling neighborhood. Why not come down to the Black Dot Cafe and
talk to the locals. I guarantee there won’t be any unreturned phone
calls.  

Sven Eberlein, San Francisco

How Is He Guilty?

In the latest article “You Don’t Know Jack,” the East Bay
Express
and Robert Gammon are trying to gain the readers sympathy
for Mr. Allstadt by telling a story of fraud and racist accusations.
They have attempted to show how one man fraudulently assassinated the
character of another; but this article is doing to Marcel Diallo
exactly what Mr. Allstadt is accusing Diallo of doing to him. I guess,
however, since now it’s perpetrated by a large organization such as the
East Bay Express, it is alright. Thus, what was supposed to look
like an authentic journalistic piece comes off as nothing more than an
editorial feature set up to express the author’s obvious dislike for
one man and his work.

Please explain how an artist changing his name (or dropping his last
name) and creating a stage name for himself amounts to dishonesty?
Prince? Marilyn Monroe? Madonna? Please explain how financial
instability and foreclosures mean that Mr. Diallo is a liar. In today’s
economic climate, who isn’t having financial difficulties?

Then the reader is told that Mr. Diallo lived “part-time on Park
Boulevard.” Big deal! Again, please explain what this has to do
with your original point challenging the honesty of Marcel Diallo and
the fraud issue at hand? Or explain how receiving help from a “white
developer from Emeryville” is relevant to Internet fraud? From what I
know, receiving monetary help is called a “bailout;” except this is one
bailout that is actually helping the community.

And what does the condition of the Black New World have to do with
anything? Dear Mr. Gammon, the rust and corrugated metal you speak of
are actually a part of the aesthetics of the building and wouldn’t the
hole you speak of point to even more reason for it to qualify for an
upgrade.

And if it’s true that an activist works “for the people” and not
against them, then it would seem that Mr. Diallo — with his
support from a white millionaire, a white city council member, a white
environmental group, and a following of many other Black, Asian, White,
Latino, and Native people — would be more the activist than Mr.
Allstadt — who, by your own words, came to challenge (i.e.,
replace) the power structures of the people within the neighborhood
that he just “recently” moved into.

Journalism 101 — State your point and then bring forth the
evidence to prove your point.

It seems you have confused yourself and the readers! You’ve tried to
inform the reader of Internet fraud when in reality, you’ve only
succeeded at emphasizing issues that point to the difficulties many
nonprofits face during recession and non-recession times.

Now if the Internet fraud claim is found true in a court of law, I’m
sure Mr. Diallo will have learned a valuable lesson. However, Mr.
Gammon, rather than trying to disparage Mr. Diallo and make us aware of
Mr. Allstadt — what you have really done is disparage yourself
and your work as a journalist.

This article, were one to read it without the irrelevant side talk,
would read as nothing more as a questionable, yet common practice among
bloggers. So, East Bay Express and Mr. Gammon, I challenge you
to present an article to your readership devoid of any of the
sensationalism or gossip-mongering pervasive in to many of today’s
so-called media outlets.

Aishah Bashir, Oakland

Outsider Reporting

As I’m sure Max Allstadt did not deserve the alarming e-mail event
in his name, I am deeply disturbed with the extremely superficial
portrayal of the Black Dot Artists Community, to the point of
worried.  I am a local urban planner and have friends who are part
of that grassroots community who do in fact put on cultural events and
community development in the name of enriching their
community. The only balanced investigative journalism shown in the
article was Robert Gammon’s ability to drive-by The Black New World and
criticize its facade structure. Gentrification is a very complex
force in West Oakland and to treat it so superficially, one-sided,
while disregarding the older community living there who is working to
build up their cultural district without a phony or corporate sponsored
tone should be commended not misunderstood by a determined
under-informed outsider journalist. I expect more from the East Bay
Express

For starters, you could check out a new book on the neighborhood
produced by Ecocity Builders and the Village Bottoms
neighborhood.http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/invited/609951/d3ef72c2b657a3e92fd306fb3a75a903

Gabriella Condie, Oakland

Thanks for the Write-Up

I’d like to thank Robert Gammon for being willing to write about my
ordeal. Given my sometimes sarcastic criticism of some (though not
all) of his articles, it was big of him to help me get the truth out.
 

That said, I have some minor qualms regarding the tone of the
article. The choice to take a dismissive voice about Black Dot Artists’
venue, the Black New World, was unwise.  Mr. Diallo’s enterprises,
though failing, have a small and loyal following. Until it was shut
down for safety and permit violations last year, the Black New World
was known for hosting well-attended events. Also, I think the photo the
Express chose of Mr. Diallo was unnecessarily goofy. Combined,
these issues made it easier for Mr. Diallo’s followers to see the
article as slanted, even though the facts presented are all well
sourced and could have stood on their own.

I also disagree with the sentence which says that my friends and I
are “challenging the neighborhood’s traditional black and progressive
power structure” in West Oakland. West Oakland’s political leadership
is among the most diverse in the city. Consider our community boards,
our councilmember, and our school board representative — the big
picture of West Oakland is that we are an encouraging collection of
ethnic and socioeconomic pluralities. I also feel that the fairest
characterization of my own political views is that I am very
progressive in a neighborhood that tends to be very very
progressive. Divisions in West Oakland are not nearly as wide as some
might think.

These minor issues aside, Mr. Gammon’s article was important, and
his research uncovered many important facts that I had not been aware
of. His willingness to take this on has focused media scrutiny on
Mr. Diallo’s enterprises. Previously it seemed that Mr. Diallo had
been able to control his own media exposure, leading other news outlets
to unquestioningly portray him as he desired.

Max Allstadt, Oakland

Stoking Racial Fires

I have worked with Diallo’s group, Black Dot Artists, directly as a
community planner over the past six months. I am deeply disappointed by
the lack of journalistic honor in Robert Gammon’s article, “You Don’t
Know Jack.” It is one-sided, inaccurate, and irresponsible. Gammon is
as capable of critical thinking as Allstadt’s dictaphone, and did not
seek Diallo’s and/or other community members’ perspectives. It is
obvious from his article that Gammon has never visited the Village
Bottoms. His article stokes dangerously divisive racial fires that will
further disempower West Oakland’s black communities and speed up
gentrification. I demand that Gammon visit the Village Bottoms, inform
himself, and do what is responsible as a journalist to correct
misperceptions that may have resulted from his slanderous article.If
unbeknownst to Gammon, he is sowing the very seed of gentrification
Diallo and other West Oakland community leaders have been trying to nip
in the bud. What is Allstadt doing in West Oakland, “challenging the
neighborhood’s traditional black and progressive power structure”? Is
it not enough that in the 1950s, in the name of “urban renewal,” black
folks were ripped out of areas like the Fillmore and West Oakland? In
the last half century, the USPS distribution center, the Cypress
freeway, and the BART track and station displaced hundreds of families
from West Oakland, barricading the remaining families from services,
downtown, and political power. It is time the region acknowledged we
benefit from the cultural wealth of African Americans as we do from a
Chinatown or the Mission district. Building the groundwork for the
black cultural district has not been easy and Gammon just hosed it down
the drain.By funding City Slicker Farms, a white-led feel-good
nonprofit, Oakland’s CDBG funding is supporting the charitable model
that locks in low-income African Americans into a class status few want
to stay in. Diallo’s Village Bottoms Farms promotes entrepreneurship
and economic self-reliance, “teaching a man how to fish,” instead of
“giving him a fish.” Neither model is more correct than the other, but
both should be able to co-exist; power and resources should be shared
equitably.

In my view, it remains inconclusive that Marcel Diallo is indeed the
originator of the e-mails from [email protected]. West Oakland
is widely known as an Internet desert, and Black Dot Cafe is one of the
local hot spots. Wi-fi access is available to anyone visiting the cafe,
during and after business hours. Many people drive by and park outside
the cafe to access the Internet. Anyone — including Max
Allstadt’s cronies — could have sent that e-mail
fraudulently.

Evidence of Gammon’s lowball character assassination, that I demand
he retracts immediately:

1) His calling out Diallo’s real name. Many spoken-word poets and
other artists have alternate names. This bears no importance to the
subject at hand. This is muckraking at the kindergarten sandbox
level.

2) Foreclosures in West Oakland and many other communities across
the country is not news. At the height of the housing boom, many
low-income families of color were targeted by predatory lenders. Many
of these lenders knew these families could not afford a house but were
encouraged to buy. Even middle-class families were victims of
adjustable rate mortgages and ensuing foreclosures. This reflects a
failure in the government and real-estate industry’s systems, more than
the individuals’ failure.

3) Gammon is ignorant of the fact that “financial grants received
from the city for after-school arts programs” are not supposed to help
pay mortgages. Such funds are restricted to be used for after-school
arts programs.

4) “The black empowerment leader … being propped up financially by
a prominent white businessman” is an incomplete description of Diallo’s
and Holliday’s partnership. Why would Holliday, an astute businessman,
simply give Diallo a free lunch? An urban planner by training, Holliday
knows that unless the area develops and improves as a whole, his
housing project will not see favorable sales. 

5) Gammon obviously has never been to the Black New World or the
farm, as he describes the Black New World building as “a rusted,
corrugated metal shack with at least one large hole in the side. As for
Village Bottoms Farms, it’s a gated vacant lot, and the only thing that
appears to resemble a farm is a mid-size planter with some tomato vines
in it.”

I urge Gammon and anyone else interested to visit and hear the story
from the Bottoms. Don’t just take Allstadt’s — or anyone’s
— words for granted and become an unwitting loudspeaker for the
forces of gentrification.

Jane Wardani, Berkeley

“Activists Try to Block Green Tech in Berkeley,” Eco Watch,
11/11

Green Tech and Green Collar

Robert Gammon’s factually challenged hit piece disguised as a news
article and spiced with personal attack may move newspapers, but
environmental sustainability, the viability of our local production
economy, and the ethnic and economic diversity of our cities deserve
better.

The author attempts through misrepresentation and stereotype to
delegitimize the West Berkeley Artisans & Industrial Companies
(WEBAIC) and the area’s residents, falsely characterize West Berkeley
as “slowly decaying,” and portray WEBAIC’s position on green tech as
opposite to what it is.

Far from the author’s implication that the West Berkeley Artisans
& Industrial Companies is one person’s “group,” WEBAIC is comprised
of over 70 local enterprises employing approximately 1,000 people, from
one-person art/craft studios to manufacturers with 250 employees. Along
with art/craft and manufacturing, WEBAIC consists of warehousing and
wholesale trade, R & D lab, industrial and construction supply,
green tech, recycling/reuse, food processing, auto repair, construction
contracting, and printing businesses. Had he listened to public
testimony at the November 4 meeting, the author would have heard
representatives of Meyer Sound, George M. Martin Co, Urban Ore, the
Ecology Center, and many other West Berkeley businesses articulate a
rational land use policy that retains the local production economy
while facilitating more space for green tech. The over 320 industrial
PDR (production, distribution, repair) companies in West Berkeley
employing upwards of 7,500 people in living-wage jobs and the over 225
art and craft studios with 800-plus people working there all depend
upon affordable, industrially zoned space. It’s part of WEBAIC’s
mission to ensure this space.

As to Mr. Gammon’s fiction of West Berkeley as “slowly decaying,”
commercial broker C.B. Richard Ellis’ 3rd quarter 09 Report shows West
Berkeley with the East Bay’s highest industrial rents and lowest
industrial vacancies (3 percent). UC Professor Karen Chapple’s report
on the West Berkeley economy shows total employment stable from
1990-2005. West Berkeley is a vital urban ecosystem built on an
extensive network supply chain where parts move in multiple steps from
basic formulation in machine shop or lab to manufacturer to finisher to
warehouse/distributor to finished product used by local business, and
ultimately back to a recycler/reuser. In three years 20 new industrial
and artisan business have located within three blocks of this writing.
Decaying? Hardly.

Had Mr. Gammon contacted WEBAIC, he would have found his claim that
our position is “no green tech in my neighborhood” and “block green
tech” to be simply untrue. WEBAIC’s proposal to easily permit
subdivision of large spaces for such uses was just approved by the
Planning Commission. In position papers and meetings WEBAIC has
consistently SUPPORTED the robust location of green tech in West
Berkeley, specifically UC spin-offs. WEBAIC believes Berkeley is in the
fortunate position to be able to both provide space for green tech R
& D (though opening up industrial protections to these uses on
1,200,000 square feet of space on six large sites targeted for green
tech by the City and streamlining the allowed conversion of 25 percent
of remaining protected space — 1,850,000 square feet) while at
the same time
assuring the continued viability of industry and arts
by maintaining protections on most of their space. Add this 3,050,000
square feet to the 3,500,000 square feet of existing non-protected
space and 6,550,000 square feet is revealed as potentially available
for green tech, or over 60% of all West Berkeley space.

The West Berkeley Plan, (the area’s guiding policy document)
recognizes that minus such a balanced protection policy, the more
highly capitalized R & D uses would displace industry and art,
sectors the Plan specifically protects to fulfill its goals of
maintaining the city’s economic and ethnic diversity, largely through
providing “good jobs, particularly to people without advanced
education.”

The author’s silence on green-collar jobs is instructive.
Green-collar work contributes not only to environmental sustainability
but also to societal equity. WEBAIC’s green-collar enterprises/workers
fulfill Berkeley General Plan goals to “increase social and economic
equity in land-use decisions” and our mission includes assuring their
viability. West Berkeley’s industrial zones are the only
Berkeley area providing significant numbers of living-wage jobs for
people without college, a large percentage being filled by people of
color. Green tech fulfills neither of these functions, thus the need
for balance.

Professor Raquel Pinderhughes’ city-commissioned Green Collar Job
study details the disparity of “the two Berkeleys”: “Economic,
educational, and racial/ethnic inequalities are profound in Berkeley.
The situation for low-income black and Latino residents is … severe
in West and South Berkeley. Black median family income is 41 percent of
white family income, … Latino and Asian … about 50%; black
unemployment is 3.22 times white unemployment, Latino 1.88 times, and
Asian 1.67 times. Providing low-income residents with … living wage
jobs is … critical … toward alleviating poverty, unemployment, and
racial inequality. Cultivation of green-collar jobs for men and women
with barriers to employment provide … benefits of green economic
development to low-income residents and communities.”

In concert with East Bay Green Corridor Principles, WEBAIC seeks to
balance green tech and green collar in service of maintaining a
sustainable and diverse local production economy and culture. We can
and will accommodate both if we have the common sense to ignore
one-sided, intemperate voices such as Mr. Gammon’s that would blind us
to the path leading not only to a sustainable future for the planet but
an equitable future for its people.

John Curl, WEBAIC chair; Rick Auerbach, WEBAIC staff;
Berkeley

“PG&E Wants More Fossil Fuel,” Eco Watch, 11/18

Approve the Gas Plant

Robert Gammon’s critique of PG&E’s natural gas plants is
misplaced. As he mentions in one place in his article, “renewables” can
neverreplace fossil fuels.

Solar thermal or photovoltaic collectors provide power only when the
sun shines. That’s it. Effectively that means six hours a day when the
sun is high. Wind, ditto. You get power when the wind is blowing, then
nothing. This means a huge capital investment for part-time power,
and because both wind and the sun’s rays are so weak, you need a huge
collection area to get anything. Thus, the high cost. Solar
and wind apparatus are dependent on fossil fuels to run the factories
in which they’re manufactured, so they’re not “renewable” at all.

The first solar plant up for approval in California in 22 years, in
Ivanpah Valley near Las Vegas, is slated to occupy a huge area, 5.3
square miles. It is rated at “400 megawatts,” but this is
misleading. The sun will shine on the mirrors one-quarter of the time,
dropping the output to 100 MW, one-tenth the output of a real power
plant. Anatural gas assist is needed to keep the boiler hot at
night, so the solar component is even lower. This is mickey mouse
by moderns standards;engineers call it “flea power.” Solar is good for
your calculator, lousy for your washing machine.

The Ivanpah operators have $160 million lined up for their
investment, which will cost a billion. They want the Obama
administration (YOU)to fund the rest with an 80 percent loan. Our
nation is bankrupt. We can’t afford solar and wind fantasies in
the desert. The gas plant should beapproved as soon as
possible.

Steve Tabor, Oakland

“Iranian Hikers Paying Price for US Spy Policies,” Raising the Bar,
11/18

How Do We Know?

Jay Youngdahl, just like Hillary Clinton, asserts that “Iranian
authorities are surely to blame with regard to these three hikers.”
Why? Did the Iranians invite them to cross the border illegally? Is it
just a coincidence that they picked that conflicted area for a
“vacation”?

How do we know when a “journalist” is actually a spy? The best guide
is when we see high-level US government’s officials claiming that
he/she is not, and demand their freedom. That was the case with Laura
Ling, Euna Lee, Roxana Saberi, and now these three. Journalist and
activist Lori Berenson has been in jail in Perú for fifteen
years, accused of being the leader of a guerrilla group when she’d only
been in Perú for a relatively short time to be a “guerrilla
leader.” However, we never heard Bill Clinton (or Hillary and Al Gore),
George W. Bush, or Barack Obama speak out in her defense and demand
that she be set free.

As for Youngdahl’s contention that the three are “progressive”
journalists; there are many of these “progressive” journalists, mostly
Jews like Dennis Bernstein and Reese Erlich on KPFA, who are rabidly
anti-Iranian and they even participated in promoting and
propagandizing demonstrations against the Iranian government in the US,
just like the US government. Regardless of the facts surrounding the
case of the three “hikers” (“journalists”), they should be executed
just for coming out of UC Berkeley. This argument is as good as the
ones presented by Youngdahl in favor of innocence.

Leo T. West, San Leandro

Miscellaneous

Grim Outlook

California’s fiscal outlook continues to worsen. Concern is mounting
over the impact the state’s budget deficit will have on education
funding.

The California Teachers Association (CTA), along with State
Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell, claims
California’s per-pupil funding now ranks 47th nationally. In reality,
most experts agree California is around the middle of the pack when it
comes to school funding, including the CTA’s own parent organization,
the National Education Association.

But what matters to most California parents isn’t how much other
states are spending — it’s the results their children’s school
districts are getting compared to other school districts right here in
California.

And on that front, California must do better. It’s not because
there’s too little funding. It’s because the state’s school financing
system is illogical and inequitable.

The California School Finance Center database — a new project
from the Pacific Research Institute and the Educational Results
Partnership (formerly Just for the Kids-California) that compiles data
from a dozen California Department of Education sources — helps
shed some much-needed light on this reality.

The data show some troubling discrepancies among similar school
districts. In Alameda County, for instance, a majority of students in
both the Fremont Unified district and the Castro Valley Unified
district scored proficient in English and math on the California
Standards Test in the 2007-08 school year. Yet Castro Valley, which
enrolled a smaller proportion of English learners and low-income
students, received $3,400 more per student that year — $13,324,
compared to Fremont’s $9,908.

Conventional wisdom suggests that districts with more money perform
better — but that’s not always the case.

Alameda City Unified and New Haven Unified had similar socioeconomic
profiles and enrolled similar proportions of English learners during
the 2007-08 school year. But Alameda outperformed New Haven by nearly
12 percentage points in English and nearly eight percentage points in
math. Despite the scoring discrepancy, both school districts received
about the same funding per student that year — $10,100 for
Alameda and $10,196 for New Haven.

Alameda County parents and taxpayers are entitled to wonder why
their school districts may be receiving more money but achieving less.
So are other Californians.

State and local per-student funding should be higher in districts
that enroll children whose educational needs make their schooling costs
higher, such as low-income students or English-learners. Yet on
average, state and local funding actually decreases as the proportions
of these students increase. Such funding disparities mean less money
for classrooms with the greatest need.

Money does matter when it comes to public school performance, but
just as important is how effectively that money is used. The California
School Finance Center database makes it easier to identify which public
school districts and charter schools are making the most of their
education dollars and emulate their success.

Vicki E. Murray, Associate Director of Education Studies, Pacific
Research Institute, Sacramento

Where’s Black Santa?

“Mommy how come Santa never looks like us?” A simple question coming
from a child who is beginning to notice all the subtle ways that we as
people of color, we as black people, we as African Americans in the
United States of America are treated and revered. My oldest child, 11
years old, stated that “it makes us feel like we are not important,
like nobody cares.” Each year at the Oakland parade the streets are
filled with the faces of children; black, many shades of brown, white
and others. Each year a white Santa represents the Christmas Spirit for
all! A white Santa at the parade every year has a negative impact
on the non-white children who year after year see no representation of
who they are. It has a negative impact on the white children
reinforcing so many other messages in society that directly or
indirectly perpetuate racism and inequality. 

My advice to the parade committee is to either a) Have more than one
Santa at the parade or b) Alternate each year with a Santa representing
a different culture.

Thanks for listening. I hope you consider my words for the sake of
my children and for the sake of many more children and families in the
city of Oakland and beyond.

Nola Brantley, Walnut Creek

Correction

In the 11/25 CD review of Larry Ochs, we misspelled the name of
pianist Satoko Fujii.

In the 12/2 letter entitled “Why Richmond Can’t Progress,” we
printed the wrong city that writer Michael Beer lives in. It’s
Richmond.

18,644FansLike
0FollowersFollow
67,429FollowersFollow

Newsletter sign-up

eLert sign-up

Oakland
few clouds
50.8 ° F
56.9 °
46.5 °
92 %
0.6mph
12 %
Thu
64 °
Fri
60 °
Sat
62 °
Sun
60 °
Mon
59 °
Support the East Bay Express, local news, donate