.Trial Begins for Gay Cop Accused of Discrimination

Richmond Police Chief Chris Magnus is accused of being a racist, but the progressive city council is standing behind him.

Is Richmond Police Chief Chris Magnus a racist? He’s white, but he’s also openly gay and is perhaps one of the most progressive police chiefs in the Bay Area. He has a strong record of promoting people of color within the police department, and enjoys the full backing of the Richmond City Council, which is currently controlled by a progressive majority and led by Mayor Gayle McLaughlin, one of the few Green Party mayors in the country. Nonetheless, starting this week Magnus will be the main defendant in what is expected to be a twelve-week trial in which seven high-ranking black officers have sued the city for discrimination, claiming that Magnus denied them promotions in order to weaken black leadership within the department.

Besides claims that Magnus did not promote certain black officers, the plaintiffs allege that he and former Deputy Chief Lori Ritter regularly made racist comments. In one instance, in which Magnus learned for the first time about the tradition of Juneteenth celebrations, he asked, “So what’s Juneteenth? Is that a holiday for shooting people?” That is the one comment Magnus admits making, though he has said that coming from Fargo, North Dakota, he had never before heard of the holiday that commemorates the abolition of slavery. Magnus disputes all of the other allegations of insensitive comments.

On the face of it, the plaintiffs’ claims appear to be a traditional case of discrimination in which the ambitions of minority employees are systematically thwarted by biased management and racist institutional policy. But this case does not easily fit that mold. Not only is Magnus a progressive, but city management has consistently tried to improve Richmond’s chronically high crime and unemployment rates by instituting some of the most innovative job training and anti-violence programs in the country.

Furthermore, the eight police officers who originally brought the case are unlikely plaintiffs. They are among the police department’s highest-ranking officers and earned an average of $182,500 in 2010 (one of the eight officers withdrew from the case).

And despite the city’s lefty political bent, the city council regards the plaintiffs’ allegations to be so flimsy it has thrown the weight of the city’s coffers into Magnus’ defense. “We’re going to bring the two cases to trial,” progressive Councilman Jeff Ritterman told Richmond Confidential in November. “We won’t settle because the case does not have merit on the other side.”

Magnus’s record of departmental promotions does not reflect a discriminatory policy. In fact, the opposite is true. Since Magnus was first appointed chief in 2006, he has promoted more people of color to the upper ranks than any of his predecessors, including two black police chiefs. Magnus has promoted three blacks, including two of the original plaintiffs, to the rank of captain. He also appointed the first Latino and first woman, Lori Ritter, to the rank of deputy chief. In 2010, some time after Ritter retired, Magnus promoted Sergeant Allwyn Brown, a black officer with extensive police experience and longstanding ties to the Richmond community, to deputy chief. Magnus has only promoted one white male to the rank of captain.

Shortly after coming to Richmond from Fargo, Magnus conducted a massive reorganizing of the department with a new emphasis on community policing. He instituted greater officer accountability and assured that officers would be assigned to the same districts for long periods of time, which cultivated deeper ties between the beat officers and the communities they patrolled. Over the years, Magnus’ new policies have shown positive results. Crime rates have steadily gone down and there has been a rise in community participation in neighborhoods where residents had grown used to living in a state of fear.

Magnus, who was resented by many of the plaintiffs because of his outsider status, is credited with reforming what was for years a very troubled department. In 2003, the department was plagued by a series of embarrassing scandals. The top advisor to then Chief Joseph Samuels abruptly retired after being accused of sexual harassment. A former officer was sentenced to sixteen years in prison for molesting a ten-year-old boy. An officer retired after being accused of having sex while on duty and another officer was fired after being accused of brutality during a Cinco de Mayo melee. That same year, Samuels, who repeatedly failed to install an effective community policing program, retired — some say at the insistence of city leaders who were pointing toward the door with fully extended arms.

Despite their high rank, at least one of the plaintiffs also has credibility problems. In 2008, Lieutenant Cleveland Brown filed for worker’s compensation after suffering a knee injury while watching television. He claimed he felt something go “pop” when he jumped up to celebrate during a televised sporting event. The city accused Brown, who took a year’s paid leave due to the injury claim, of fraud because the injury did not happen while he was at work and sought to fire him. Brown said the city’s action was out of retaliation for the lawsuit. In 2010, Brown was demoted from the fourth highest-ranking officer in the department to a lieutenant, although it is uncertain if it was related to the alleged fraudulent worker’s compensation claim.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

East Bay Express E-edition East Bay Express E-edition